Wednesday, March 11, 2009

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes

Mr. M introduced me to 'Watchmen', written by Alan Moore and illustrated by Dave Gibbons about a year ago after reading an Entertainment Weekly review placing it #13 on the top 100 list of best books in the last 25 years. Of course lists are subjective and rankings are arbitrary, but this wonderful piece of literature lives up to the hype. However, i cant say the movie has. Not to say that the movie was terrible; because i can think of 5 movies (Brazil, Teeth, Cannibal Holocaust, Franken-Hooker, and Match Point), that were real shit-fests. The movie is in fact very entertaining.

Around the water cooler on Monday (that's just an expression, there are no water cooler's in HELL) i heard simpletons, cretins and meat heads alike complaining that the movie was weak. On the contrary, Mr. M and i left the theatre on Sunday feeling happy that the movie was not a complete bastardization of the novel. Unfortunately, this is not a made for big screen story. The novel's subtlety, sarcastic irony, and political commentary are lost in its big budget celluloid counterpart. This is not to say that we loved the movie, we liked it, we were happy with it, disappointed at times and relieved at others.

It's clear to me that Director Zack Snyder is truly a fan of the 80's "comic" and that he tried to make the movie as true to the novel as Hollywood would allow him to. 'Watchmen' has a great soundtrack and the R-rating promises Gorey violence, lots of full frontal blue nudity, and sexy results. over all i give the movie a solid B. I give the novel an A+

NOTE: remember when you first watched a colorized version of 'It's a wonderful life' and felt that the color looked unnatural and weird and that maybe the original Black and White version was better? I do.